IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

David Huk Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-11-10 Country: Czechia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Linköping HC U20 SHL-J20 27 6 9 15 0.556 0.3088 0.3342 0.7403 0.8012
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
65%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18982
Forward overall
#271
Forward born in 2008
#1054
in SHL-J20

D1 Comparables

Karson Kuhlman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Shane Eiserman
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Pavelek
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan State
0.25 No data
NCAAe PPG
Joe Snively
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Yale (0.88 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Connor Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Schremp
Elmira · 2000-01
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Cory Callen
Fitchburg State · 2005-06
1.071 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryan Hovanec
Lebanon Valley · 2011-12
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.