IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carter McWilliams Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-02-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Rochester Monarchs USPHL-Premier 9 5 5 10 1.111 0.1253 0.1253 0.3772 0.3772
2020-21 Brewster NE-Prep 5 3 1 4 0.800 0.1536 0.1536 0.3645 0.3645
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 SUNYAC — 4 1 3 4 1.000
2024-25 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 SUNYAC — 4 1 3 4 1.000
2023-24 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 SUNYAC — 4 1 3 4 1.000
2022-23 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 SUNYAC — 4 1 3 4 1.000
2021-22 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 SUNYAC — 4 1 3 4 1.000
2020-21 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 SUNYAC — 4 1 3 4 1.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
50%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Ryan Fitzgerald
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cédric Lacroix
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Gaudreau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gabriel Filion
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2022-23
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Scott Taje
Lake Forest · 2000-01
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alexander Laseen
Curry · 2004-05
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.