← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trent Gephart Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-01-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Tampa Bay Juniors USPHL-Elite 40 6 16 22 0.550 0.0508 0.0541 0.1260 0.1342
2018-19 Tampa Bay Juniors USPHL-Elite 40 31 20 51 1.275 0.1177 0.1200 0.2920 0.2977
2020-21 Utah Outliers USPHL-Premier 30 8 6 14 0.467 0.0610 0.0610 0.1584 0.1584
2021-22 Utah Outliers USPHL-Premier 49 8 11 19 0.388 0.0507 0.0465 0.1316 0.1206
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Utah ACHA_D1 5 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 University of Utah ACHA_D1 5 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 University of Utah ACHA_D1 5 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 University of Utah ACHA_D1 5 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 University of Utah ACHA_D1 5 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 University of Utah ACHA_D1 5 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#35400
Forward overall
#1910
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2006-07
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2016-17
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2022-23
0.231 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.