IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aaron Rochinsky Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-01-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Toledo Cherokee NA3HL 19 3 7 10 0.526 0.0671 0.0711 0.1665 0.1764
2014-15 Toledo Cherokee NA3HL 32 10 14 24 0.750 0.0956 0.0966 0.2372 0.2396
2015-16 Espanola Paper Kings NOJHL 38 7 11 18 0.474 0.0807 0.0771 0.2008 0.1920
2016-17 Espanola Paper Kings NOJHL 48 23 24 47 0.979 0.1668 0.1514 0.4150 0.3766
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Aurora D3 NCHA — 13 1 0 1 0.077
2017-18 Aurora D3 NCHA — 24 1 2 3 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2017-18 · Aurora
+20.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#31480
Forward overall
#1330
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jesse Modahl
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2001-02
0.733 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Lazier
Albertus Magnus · 2018-19
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael McChesney
St. Norbert · 2018-19
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.