← New Search ↗ Social Card

Shawn Donovan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-11-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Pittsburgh Vengeance USPHL-Premier 42 1 11 12 0.286 0.0374 0.0374 0.0970 0.0970
2021-22 Pittsburgh Vengeance USPHL-Premier 41 5 27 32 0.780 0.1021 0.0979 0.2649 0.2540
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Indiana University of Pennsylvania ACHA_D1 30 4 8 12 0.400
2024-25 Indiana University of Pennsylvania ACHA_D1 30 4 8 12 0.400
2023-24 Indiana University of Pennsylvania ACHA_D1 30 4 8 12 0.400
2022-23 Indiana University of Pennsylvania ACHA_D1 30 4 8 12 0.400
2021-22 Indiana University of Pennsylvania ACHA_D1 30 4 8 12 0.400
2020-21 Indiana University of Pennsylvania ACHA_D1 30 4 8 12 0.400

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7468
Defenseman overall
#1575
Defenseman born in 2001
#2365
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Fredonia · 2021-22
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Post · 2016-17
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2013-14
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.