← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mark Woolley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-11-26 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Guelph Storm OHL 66 2 7 9 0.136 0.0789 0.0886 0.3495 0.3924
2018-19 OHL 55 2 6 8 0.145 0.0842 0.0906 0.3728 0.4009
2019-20 Owen Sound Attack OHL 50 2 10 12 0.240 0.1388 0.1388 0.6150 0.6150
2021-22 Owen Sound Attack OHL 54 3 9 12 0.222 0.1285 0.1182 0.5694 0.5237
2022-23 St. Francis Xavier Univ. usports 30 2 5 7 0.233
2023-24 St. Francis Xavier Univ. usports 27 1 3 4 0.148
2024-25 St. Francis Xavier Univ. usports 21 1 5 6 0.286
2025-26 St. Francis Xavier Univ. usports 28 1 7 8 0.286
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2004-05 Buffalo State D3 FR 5 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13802
Defenseman overall
#2378
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2016-17
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2014-15
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Michael's College · 2018-19
0.955 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.