← New Search ↗ Social Card

Stefano Mini Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-02-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Detroit Fighting Irish USPHL-Premier 38 5 5 10 0.263 0.0344 0.0344 0.0893 0.0893
2021-22 Detroit Fighting Irish USPHL-Premier 36 5 7 12 0.333 0.0436 0.0446 0.1131 0.1156
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Oakland University ACHA_D1 31 3 11 14 0.452
2024-25 Oakland University ACHA_D1 31 3 11 14 0.452
2023-24 Oakland University ACHA_D1 31 3 11 14 0.452
2022-23 Oakland University ACHA_D1 31 3 11 14 0.452
2021-22 Oakland University ACHA_D1 31 3 11 14 0.452
2020-21 Oakland University ACHA_D1 31 3 11 14 0.452

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
72%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#46792
Forward overall
#3074
Forward born in 2003
#4786
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Canisius
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Manhattanville · 2012-13
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2012-13
0.312 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Gustavus Adolphus · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.