← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Quinn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-09-19 Country: Canada
2020 NHL Draft Round 1, Pick #8  ·  Buffalo Sabres Buffalo Sabres
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 OHL 8 0 1 1 0.125 0.0723 0.0805 0.3203 0.3566
2018-19 OHL 61 12 20 32 0.525 0.3035 0.3236 1.3443 1.4333
2019-20 OHL 62 52 37 89 1.435 0.8304 0.8304 3.6785 3.6785
2020-21 Minnetonka USHS-MN 20 10 1 11 0.550 0.0678 0.0678 0.1336 0.1336
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Long Island Univ. D1 AHA SR 34 2 6 8 0.235
2022-23 Long Island Univ. D1 AHA JR 36 6 8 14 0.389
2021-22 Long Island Univ. D1 AHA SO 28 4 5 9 0.321
2020-21 LIU D1 FR 13 1 3 4 0.308
2020-21 Long Island Univ. D1 AHA FR 13 1 3 4 0.308
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2020-21 · LIU
+58.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
75%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11326
Forward overall
#493
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Norbert · 2018-19
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Augsburg · 2002-03
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2000-01
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.