← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brock Baker Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-10-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 36 3 5 8 0.222 0.1311 0.1344 0.6652 0.6817
2019-20 Madison Capitols USHL 46 5 8 13 0.283 0.1667 0.1667 0.8460 0.8460
2020-21 Chippewa Steel NAHL 47 10 12 22 0.468 0.1663 0.1663 0.4938 0.4938
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 31 7 16 23 0.742
2023-24 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 26 4 10 14 0.538
2022-23 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 27 5 11 16 0.593
2021-22 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 30 10 8 18 0.600
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.60
2021-22 · St. Norbert
+421.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
72%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#33179
Forward overall
#1687
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Salve Regina · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2015-16
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Hobart · 2010-11
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.