IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jonah Alexander Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-11-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 43 6 21 27 0.628 0.1539 0.1673 0.4298 0.4672
2017-18 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 42 17 17 34 0.809 0.1984 0.2061 0.5541 0.5756
2018-19 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 49 15 41 56 1.143 0.2801 0.2773 0.7823 0.7744
2019-20 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 54 25 53 78 1.444 0.3540 0.3540 0.9887 0.9887
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Hobart D3 SUNYAC — 29 6 22 28 0.966
2022-23 Hobart D3 SUNYAC — 30 15 19 34 1.133
2021-22 Hobart D3 SUNYAC — 25 6 15 21 0.840
2020-21 Alabama Huntsville D1 — FR 10 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Alabama-Huntsville D1 — FR 10 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

55%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10893
Forward overall
#481
Forward born in 1999
#237
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

A.J. Fossen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Grant Opperman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Dartmouth (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Kenny Gillespie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ RPI (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Peter Krieger
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bo Webster
Hobart · 2011-12
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Vincent Dekumbis
Lawrence · 2016-17
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Dillon Henningson
Manhattanville · 2004-05
0.765 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.