← New Search ↗ Social Card

Leonard Haban Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-11-24 Country: Slovakia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 New York Aviators USPHL-Elite 21 10 4 14 0.667 0.0615 0.0615 0.1527 0.1527
2021-22 Brooklyn Aviators USPHL-Premier 27 11 16 27 1.000 0.1308 0.1256 0.3394 0.3259
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 West Virginia University ACHA_D1 28 21 26 47 1.679
2024-25 West Virginia University ACHA_D1 28 21 26 47 1.679
2023-24 West Virginia University ACHA_D1 28 21 26 47 1.679
2022-23 West Virginia University ACHA_D1 28 21 26 47 1.679
2021-22 West Virginia University ACHA_D1 28 21 26 47 1.679
2020-21 West Virginia University ACHA_D1 28 21 26 47 1.679

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22433
Forward overall
#1107
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Buffalo State · 2008-09
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2023-24
1.200 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2010-11
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.