IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brendan Bauer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-03-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Timmins Rock NOJHL 4 0 1 1 0.250 0.0418 0.0418 0.1041 0.1041
2021-22 Ontario Jr. Reign USPHL-Premier 11 16 10 26 2.364 0.3092 0.2856 0.8022 0.7411
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Davenport University ACHA_D1 — — 40 20 18 38 0.950
2024-25 Davenport University ACHA_D1 — — 40 20 18 38 0.950
2023-24 Davenport University ACHA_D1 — — 40 20 18 38 0.950
2022-23 Davenport University ACHA_D1 — — 40 20 18 38 0.950
2021-22 Davenport University ACHA_D1 — — 40 20 18 38 0.950
2020-21 Davenport University ACHA_D1 — — 40 20 18 38 0.950

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2451
Forward overall
#95
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matthew Monreal
Southern New Hampshire · 2018-19
0.450 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Kemp
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2001-02
0.536 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ethan James
Wisconsin-Superior · 2015-16
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.