← New Search ↗ Social Card

Devon Mastay Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-10-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Metro Jets USPHL-Premier 37 3 11 14 0.378 0.0495 0.0523 0.1284 0.1356
2022-23 Metro Jets USPHL-Premier 41 4 13 17 0.415 0.0542 0.0546 0.1407 0.1416
2023-24 Metro Jets USPHL-Premier 32 7 24 31 0.969 0.1267 0.1214 0.3288 0.3151
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Pittsburgh ACHA_D1 28 1 6 7 0.250
2024-25 University of Pittsburgh ACHA_D1 28 1 6 7 0.250
2023-24 University of Pittsburgh ACHA_D1 28 1 6 7 0.250
2022-23 University of Pittsburgh ACHA_D1 28 1 6 7 0.250
2021-22 University of Pittsburgh ACHA_D1 28 1 6 7 0.250
2020-21 University of Pittsburgh ACHA_D1 28 1 6 7 0.250

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5945
Defenseman overall
#1455
Defenseman born in 2003
#1888
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Castleton · 2008-09
0.316 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2024-25
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.