← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jackson Studebaker Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-07-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Westonka USHS-MN 26 4 5 9 0.346 0.0932 0.0932 0.0841 0.0841
2020-21 Westonka USHS-MN 18 2 5 7 0.389 0.1047 0.1047 0.0945 0.0945
2021-22 Tampa Bay Juniors USPHL-Premier 42 1 13 14 0.333 0.1099 0.1145 0.1134 0.1182
2022-23 Tampa Bay Juniors USPHL-Premier 43 3 11 14 0.326 0.1073 0.1066 0.1108 0.1100
2023-24 Bold City Battalion USPHL-Premier 44 10 17 27 0.614 0.2022 0.1910 0.2087 0.1972
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Niagara ACHA_D1 1 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Niagara ACHA_D1 1 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Niagara ACHA_D1 1 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Niagara ACHA_D1 1 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Niagara ACHA_D1 1 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Niagara ACHA_D1 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#36426
Forward overall
#2248
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stout · 2015-16
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2018-19
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.