IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nicholas Viselli Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-08-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Elmira Impact USPHL-Premier 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 WB/Scranton Knights USPHL-Elite 40 13 16 29 0.725 0.1274 0.1150 0.1661 0.1500
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 — — 3 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 — — 3 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 — — 3 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 — — 3 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 — — 3 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 — — 3 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#40998
Forward overall
#2303
Forward born in 2001
#3864
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jack Jenkins
Suffolk · 2013-14
0.346 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrick Choi
Connecticut College · 2018-19
0.235 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Lauder
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2009-10
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.