IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Jenkins Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-09-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Northern Cyclones EHL 44 7 12 19 0.432 0.1520 0.1457 0.2117 0.2029
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Suffolk D3 CNE SR 25 3 0 3 0.120
2016-17 Suffolk D3 CNE JR 25 3 5 8 0.320
2015-16 Suffolk D3 CNE SO 22 3 3 6 0.273
2014-15 Suffolk D3 CNE FR 26 3 6 9 0.346
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2014-15 · Suffolk
+177.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#36273
Forward overall
#1280
Forward born in 1993
#1363
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Victor Bergström
Plymouth State · 2015-16
0.471 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Christian Elsborg
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2013-14
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Phillip Middleton
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2015-16
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.