← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mikhail Anikin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-02-13 Country: Russia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Jersey Shore Whalers USPHL-Premier 42 6 4 10 0.238 0.0311 0.0333 0.0808 0.0865
2022-23 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 18 0 3 3 0.167 0.0680 0.0705 0.1340 0.1389
2023-24 Jersey Hitmen USPHL-Premier 40 15 23 38 0.950 0.1243 0.1210 0.3224 0.3139
2024-25 Jersey Hitmen USPHL-Premier 29 4 6 10 0.345 0.0451 0.0413 0.1170 0.1071
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 New York University ACHA_D1 2 0 1 1 0.500
2024-25 New York University ACHA_D1 2 0 1 1 0.500
2023-24 New York University ACHA_D1 2 0 1 1 0.500
2022-23 New York University ACHA_D1 2 0 1 1 0.500
2021-22 New York University ACHA_D1 2 0 1 1 0.500
2020-21 New York University ACHA_D1 2 0 1 1 0.500

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8638
Defenseman overall
#1966
Defenseman born in 2004
#2663
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alvernia · 2023-24
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Assumption · 2023-24
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Olaf · 2024-25
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.