← New Search ↗ Social Card

Christian Regan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-09-10 Country: New Zealand
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Charleston Colonials USPHL-Elite 40 6 11 17 0.425 0.0392 0.0392 0.0973 0.0973
2020-21 Atlanta Mad Hatters USPHL-Elite 34 9 11 20 0.588 0.0543 0.0543 0.1347 0.1347
2021-22 Atlanta Mad Hatters USPHL-Elite 42 11 19 30 0.714 0.0659 0.0597 0.1636 0.1482
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Adrian ACHA_D1 NCHA 36 11 16 27 0.750
2024-25 Adrian ACHA_D1 NCHA 36 11 16 27 0.750
2023-24 Adrian ACHA_D1 NCHA 36 11 16 27 0.750
2022-23 Adrian ACHA_D1 NCHA 36 11 16 27 0.750
2021-22 Adrian ACHA_D1 NCHA 36 11 16 27 0.750
2020-21 Adrian ACHA_D1 NCHA 36 11 16 27 0.750
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.75
2020-21 · Adrian
+2132.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#45405
Forward overall
#2640
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Brockport · 2016-17
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2003-04
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2021-22
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.