← New Search ↗ Social Card

Yarne Vaerewyck Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-08-13 Country: Belgium
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 South Shore Kings USPHL-Premier 42 3 7 10 0.238 0.0311 0.0325 0.0808 0.0845
2022-23 Metro Jets USPHL-Premier 40 17 21 38 0.950 0.1243 0.1239 0.3224 0.3213
2023-24 Metro Jets USPHL-Premier 40 16 14 30 0.750 0.0981 0.0930 0.2545 0.2414
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Grand Valley State University ACHA_D1 31 9 8 17 0.548
2024-25 Grand Valley State University ACHA_D1 31 9 8 17 0.548
2023-24 Grand Valley State University ACHA_D1 31 9 8 17 0.548
2022-23 Grand Valley State University ACHA_D1 31 9 8 17 0.548
2021-22 Grand Valley State University ACHA_D1 31 9 8 17 0.548
2020-21 Grand Valley State University ACHA_D1 31 9 8 17 0.548

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24035
Forward overall
#1320
Forward born in 2003
#1704
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Albertus Magnus · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Anna Maria · 2023-24
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2014-15
0.323 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.