← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mason Moore Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-11-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Hershey Cubs USPHL-Premier 17 3 3 6 0.353 0.0398 0.0441 0.1201 0.1331
2022-23 Connecticut Jr. Rangers NCDC 7 0 1 1 0.143 0.0330 0.0354 0.1155 0.1240
2023-24 Connecticut Jr. Rangers NCDC 33 6 9 15 0.455 0.1050 0.1068 0.3675 0.3738
2024-25 Connecticut Jr. Rangers NCDC 50 4 9 13 0.260 0.0601 0.0585 0.2102 0.2044
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Delaware ACHA_D1 29 10 11 21 0.724
2024-25 Delaware ACHA_D1 29 10 11 21 0.724
2023-24 Delaware ACHA_D1 29 10 11 21 0.724
2022-23 Delaware ACHA_D1 29 10 11 21 0.724
2021-22 Delaware ACHA_D1 29 10 11 21 0.724
2020-21 Delaware ACHA_D1 29 10 11 21 0.724

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32513
Forward overall
#1956
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gustavus Adolphus · 2016-17
0.188 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Olaf · 2013-14
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2006-07
0.231 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.