← New Search ↗ Social Card

R.J. Graziano Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-09-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Wooster Oilers USPHL-Premier 42 0 1 1 0.024 0.0078 0.0086 0.0081 0.0089
2022-23 USPHL-Premier 35 3 0 3 0.086 0.0282 0.0297 0.0292 0.0308
2024-25 Perth-Andover Bearcats USPHL-Premier 36 1 2 3 0.083 0.0275 0.0260 0.0283 0.0268
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 3 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 3 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 3 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 3 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 3 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 3 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#62707
Forward overall
#4578
Forward born in 2004
#7595
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ New Hampshire
0.10 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Becker · 2016-17
0.048 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Dartmouth · 2021-22
0.217 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint John's · 2013-14
0.091 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.