← New Search ↗ Social Card

Owen Tutich Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-10-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Wisconsin Rapids Riverkings USPHL-Premier 44 14 20 34 0.773 0.1011 0.1018 0.2623 0.2640
2024-25 Wisconsin Rapids Riverkings USPHL-Premier 44 22 39 61 1.386 0.1813 0.1719 0.4705 0.4460
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Indiana University of Pennsylvania ACHA_D1 35 14 19 33 0.943
2024-25 Indiana University of Pennsylvania ACHA_D1 35 14 19 33 0.943
2023-24 Indiana University of Pennsylvania ACHA_D1 35 14 19 33 0.943
2022-23 Indiana University of Pennsylvania ACHA_D1 35 14 19 33 0.943
2021-22 Indiana University of Pennsylvania ACHA_D1 35 14 19 33 0.943
2020-21 Indiana University of Pennsylvania ACHA_D1 35 14 19 33 0.943

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10672
Forward overall
#436
Forward born in 2004
#505
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Norbert · 2006-07
0.438 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Olaf · 2017-18
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.