IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

A.J. Mule Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-08-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 New Jersey 87's EHLP 35 16 18 34 0.971 0.0631 0.0631 0.2188 0.2188
2020-21 New Jersey 87's EHLP 28 5 9 14 0.500 0.0325 0.0325 0.1126 0.1126
2021-22 — EHL 33 1 3 4 0.121 0.0177 0.0182 0.0594 0.0611
2022-23 New York Apple Core EHL 23 2 3 5 0.217 0.0318 0.0311 0.1066 0.1042
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Delaware ACHA_D1 — — 11 1 1 2 0.182
2024-25 Delaware ACHA_D1 — — 11 1 1 2 0.182
2023-24 Delaware ACHA_D1 — — 11 1 1 2 0.182
2022-23 Delaware ACHA_D1 — — 11 1 1 2 0.182
2021-22 Delaware ACHA_D1 — — 11 1 1 2 0.182
2020-21 Delaware ACHA_D1 — — 11 1 1 2 0.182

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#44676
Forward overall
#2835
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alex Kielczewski
Becker · 2015-16
0.111 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jackson Stimple
SUNY Geneseo · 2024-25
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brady Horn
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2008-09
0.393 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.