IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Kielczewski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-08-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Bay State Breakers USPHL-Elite 44 25 26 51 1.159 0.1390 0.1390 0.2661 0.2661
2015-16 Portland Jr. Pirates USPHL-Elite 40 19 18 37 0.925 0.1109 0.1057 0.2124 0.2024
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Becker D3 — SR 25 0 6 6 0.240
2018-19 Becker D3 — JR 25 0 2 2 0.080
2017-18 Becker D3 — SO 24 1 5 6 0.250
2016-17 Becker D3 — FR 18 1 1 2 0.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2016-17 · Becker
-1.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9562
Defenseman overall
#1385
Defenseman born in 1995
#151
in USPHL-Elite

D1 Comparables

Jake Flynn
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UConn (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Casey Nelson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Zink
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Victor Bergström
Plymouth State · 2015-16
0.471 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Christian Elsborg
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2013-14
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Phillip Middleton
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2015-16
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.