IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Kielczewski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-08-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Bay State Breakers USPHL-Elite 44 25 26 51 1.159 0.1070 0.1070 0.2654 0.2654
2015-16 Portland Jr. Pirates USPHL-Elite 40 19 18 37 0.925 0.0854 0.0814 0.2118 0.2019
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Becker D3 — SR 25 0 6 6 0.240
2018-19 Becker D3 — JR 25 0 2 2 0.080
2017-18 Becker D3 — SO 24 1 5 6 0.250
2016-17 Becker D3 — FR 18 1 1 2 0.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2016-17 · Becker
+28.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8221
Defenseman overall
#1281
Defenseman born in 1995
#142
in USPHL-Elite

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Victor Bergström
Plymouth State · 2015-16
0.471 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Phillip Middleton
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2015-16
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Garrett Wood
Worcester State · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.