← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacob Webb Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-04-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Columbus Mavericks USPHL-Premier 36 16 10 26 0.722 0.0945 0.0921 0.2451 0.2389
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 West Virginia University ACHA_D1 6 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 West Virginia University ACHA_D1 6 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 West Virginia University ACHA_D1 6 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 West Virginia University ACHA_D1 6 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 West Virginia University ACHA_D1 6 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 West Virginia University ACHA_D1 6 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
35%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22962
Forward overall
#1283
Forward born in 2005
#1613
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2013-14
0.565 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2003-04
0.231 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2018-19
0.235 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.