IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Samuel Bresnock Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-01-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Buffalo Stampede USPHL-Premier 24 0 3 3 0.125 0.0163 0.0174 0.0424 0.0453
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 AHA — 8 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 AHA — 8 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 AHA — 8 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 AHA — 8 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 AHA — 8 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 AHA — 8 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
78%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27751
Defenseman overall
#4253
Defenseman born in 2005
#6952
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

David Drake
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ UConn (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Alec McCrea
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Cornell (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Alex Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Lukas Buchta
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Clint Lewis
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Cornell (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brett Beckfeld
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2002-03
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Cosmano
Wisconsin-Superior · 2002-03
0.111 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Hayden Hanson
Utica · 2011-12
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.