IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brett Beckfeld Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-01-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 14 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2002-03 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 47 3 1 4 0.085 0.0523 0.0550 0.2507 0.2638
2003-04 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 55 4 13 17 0.309 0.1900 0.1899 0.9107 0.9103
2004-05 Bozeman Ice Dogs NAHL 45 3 12 15 0.333 0.1321 0.1271 0.3499 0.3366
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 — SR 27 3 13 16 0.593
2007-08 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 — JR 27 12 10 22 0.815
2006-07 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 — SO 25 10 8 18 0.720
2005-06 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 — FR 23 6 6 12 0.522
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2005-06 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+300.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#39986
Forward overall
#1237
Forward born in 1985

D1 Comparables

Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Vallescuro
Curry · 2012-13
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Gavin Bloder
Fredonia · 2022-23
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Devin Panzeca
SUNY Potsdam · 2016-17
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.