← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brenden Wolff Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-03-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Boston Jr. Rangers EHLP 25 1 6 7 0.280 0.0321 0.0320 0.0631 0.0629
2023-24 Boston Jr. Rangers EHLP 41 5 23 28 0.683 0.0783 0.0744 0.1539 0.1463
2024-25 Northwest Express USPHL-Premier 23 4 15 19 0.826 0.1081 0.0995 0.2804 0.2582
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 30 1 3 4 0.133
2024-25 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 30 1 3 4 0.133
2023-24 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 30 1 3 4 0.133
2022-23 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 30 1 3 4 0.133
2021-22 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 30 1 3 4 0.133
2020-21 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 30 1 3 4 0.133

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8418
Defenseman overall
#1923
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Superior · 2024-25
0.579 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2024-25
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2016-17
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.