← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Jordan McQuade Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: Unknown Country: Canada
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.09
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.0961
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.22
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.2313
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

5%
NCAA D1W
5%
NCAA D3W
90%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2023-24 North York Storm OWHL-U22 37 0 2 2 0.054 0.0189 0.0189
2024-25 North York Storm OWHL-U22 30 1 3 4 0.133 0.0466 0.0466
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2025-26 Concordia (WI) NCHA FR 24 3 4 7 0.292

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Ellie Larson USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG 0.143 RIT
Sylvie Wallin USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG 0.333 Princeton
Kate Glover USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG 0.167 Harvard
Lauren Niska USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG 0.000 Minnesota Duluth
Brinna Dochniak USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG 0.111 RIT

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Lauren Riccobelli 2024-25 · 0.52 PPG 0.320 SUNY Oswego SUNYAC
Hunter Reardon 2022-23 · 0.42 PPG 0.407 Adrian NCHA
Bella Webb 2022-23 · 0.56 PPG 0.316 Bethel MIAC
Ava Johansson 2022-23 · 1.23 PPG 0.130 Wisconsin-Eau Claire WIAC
Lily Anderson 2022-23 · 0.43 PPG 0.385 Endicott NEHC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.