Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | Cushing | NE-Prep-Girls | 34 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | N/A | N/A |
| 2021-22 | Cushing | NE-Prep-Girls | 27 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.110 | 0.0357 | 0.0357 |
| 2022-23 | Cushing | NE-Prep-Girls | 32 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | N/A | N/A |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | University of New England | CNE | JR | 27 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 0.259 |
| 2024-25 | University of New England | NEHC | SO | 25 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.080 |
| 2023-24 | University of New England | NEHC | FR | 23 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 0.304 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paige Michel | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG | 0.348 | UConn |
| Brinna Dochniak | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG | 0.111 | RIT |
| Grace Bowlby | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG | 0.316 | Wisconsin |
| Heather Olson | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG | 0.143 | Bemidji State |
| Xylia Lang | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG | 0.091 | Lindenwood |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexis Larsen | 2024-25 · 0.83 PPG | 0.083 | Wisconsin-River Falls | WIAC |
| Halle Dunleavy | 2022-23 · 0.26 PPG | 0.286 | St. Catherine | MIAC |
| Emma Ramstorf | 2024-25 · 0.81 PPG | 0.087 | Hamline | MIAC |
| Astrid Wilbur | 2023-24 · 0.23 PPG | 0.292 | Hood College | UCHC |
| Hannah Peterson | 2024-25 · 0.59 PPG | 0.130 | Hamline | MIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.