Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | Cushing | NE-Prep-Girls | 23 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 0.220 | 0.0715 | 0.0715 |
| 2019-20 | Cushing | NE-Prep-Girls | 34 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.120 | 0.0390 | 0.0390 |
| 2021-22 | Cushing | NE-Prep-Girls | 27 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.190 | 0.0617 | 0.0617 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Curry | CNE | SR | 24 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0.208 |
| 2024-25 | Curry | NEHC | JR | 26 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0.269 |
| 2023-24 | Curry | NEHC | SO | 28 | 1 | 12 | 13 | 0.464 |
| 2022-23 | Curry | NEHC | FR | 26 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 0.346 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abby Ecker | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG | 0.000 | Bemidji State |
| Jordan Jackson | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG | 0.130 | Minnesota State |
| Lauren Niska | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG | 0.000 | Minnesota Duluth |
| Tristen Truax | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG | 0.167 | Minnesota State |
| Kate Glover | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG | 0.167 | Harvard |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Smythe | 2024-25 · 1.16 PPG | 0.105 | Wisconsin-River Falls | WIAC |
| Kellsey Kludt | 2024-25 · 0.68 PPG | 0.200 | St. Olaf | MIAC |
| Rylie Griffiths | 2025-26 · 0.31 PPG | — | Post | NE10 |
| Madison McCullough | 2022-23 · 0.32 PPG | — | Wisconsin-Superior | WIAC |
| Kaitlin Roberts | 2023-24 · 0.31 PPG | — | Gustavus Adolphus | MIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.