Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | Breck School (W) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.160 | 0.0242 | 0.0242 |
| 2020-21 | Breck School (W) | USHS-MN-W | 19 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 0.316 | 0.0477 | 0.0477 |
| 2021-22 | Academy of Holy Angels (W) | USHS-MN-W | 28 | 0 | 11 | 11 | 0.393 | 0.0593 | 0.0593 |
| 2022-23 | Academy of Holy Angels (W) | USHS-MN-W | 27 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 0.370 | 0.0559 | 0.0559 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | St. Scholastica | NCHA | JR | 23 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.174 |
| 2024-25 | St. Scholastica | NCHA | SO | 25 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.040 |
| 2023-24 | St. Scholastica | NCHA | FR | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lauren Niska | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG | 0.000 | Minnesota Duluth |
| Kate Glover | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG | 0.167 | Harvard |
| Abby Ecker | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG | 0.000 | Bemidji State |
| Jordan Jackson | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG | 0.130 | Minnesota State |
| Ellie Larson | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG | 0.143 | RIT |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kellsey Kludt | 2024-25 · 0.68 PPG | 0.200 | St. Olaf | MIAC |
| Merrill Delich | 2023-24 · 0.28 PPG | 0.500 | Saint Benedict | MIAC |
| Emma Halweg | 2022-23 · 0.36 PPG | — | Saint Benedict | MIAC |
| Kelsi Ries | 2023-24 · 0.89 PPG | 0.158 | Augsburg | MIAC |
| Amanda Smythe | 2024-25 · 1.16 PPG | 0.105 | Wisconsin-River Falls | WIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.