Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-21 | Clinton High | USHS-W | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.250 | 0.0212 | 0.0212 |
| 2021-22 | Clinton High | USHS-W | 10 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0.400 | 0.0340 | 0.0340 |
| 2022-23 | Clinton High | USHS-W | 14 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.286 | 0.0243 | 0.0243 |
| 2023-24 | Clinton High | USHS-W | 10 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.400 | 0.0340 | 0.0340 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Morrisville | SUNYAC | SO | 25 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.080 |
| 2024-25 | Morrisville | SUNYAC | FR | 24 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.125 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paige Michel | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG | 0.348 | UConn |
| Brinna Dochniak | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG | 0.111 | RIT |
| Grace Bowlby | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG | 0.316 | Wisconsin |
| Heather Olson | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG | 0.143 | Bemidji State |
| Xylia Lang | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG | 0.091 | Lindenwood |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lydia Walsh | 2022-23 · 0.25 PPG | — | Elmira | UCHC |
| Caroline Thompson | 2022-23 · 0.31 PPG | 0.320 | Southern Maine | NEHC |
| Jordan Caroccio | 2022-23 · 0.33 PPG | 0.280 | Canton | SUNYAC |
| Sophie Johnson | 2023-24 · 0.77 PPG | 0.143 | St. Scholastica | NCHA |
| Anika Mader | 2021-22 · 0.25 PPG | — | Gustavus Adolphus | MIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.