← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Laine Tomesch Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: Unknown Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.12
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.1268
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.23
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.2421
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2011-12 University School USHS-W 23 13 13 26 1.130 0.0960 0.0960
2012-13 University School USHS-W 24 17 22 39 1.625 0.1380 0.1380
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2014-15 Concordia (WI) NCHA SO 6 0 1 1 0.167
2013-14 Concordia (WI) NCHA FR 13 2 2 4 0.308

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Izzy Bagi 19U-AAA-W · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG 0.556 Holy Cross
Ebba Strandberg SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG 0.333 Maine
Kenzie Prater USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG 0.432 Quinnipiac
Emma Turbyville NE-Prep-Girls · 2013-14 · 0.39 PPG 0.040 St. Cloud State
Allison Roethke USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG 0.000 Quinnipiac

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Cara Cook 2022-23 · 1.12 PPG 0.333 Aurora NCHA
Amber Meluzio 2024-25 · 0.79 PPG 0.464 Elmira UCHC
Lily McKenzie 2024-25 · 1.81 PPG 0.210 Wisconsin-River Falls WIAC
Julia Osowski 2010-11 · 1.42 PPG 0.269 Wisconsin-Eau Claire WIAC
Torrey Taussig 2005-06 · 0.68 PPG 0.560 Williams NESCAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.