← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Laine Tomesch Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: Unknown Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.12
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.1255
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.23
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.2416
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2011-12 University School USHS-W 23 13 13 26 1.130 0.0934 0.0934
2012-13 University School USHS-W 24 17 22 39 1.625 0.1342 0.1342
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2014-15 Concordia (WI) NCHA SO 6 0 1 1 0.167
2013-14 Concordia (WI) NCHA FR 13 2 2 4 0.308

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Ebba Strandberg SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG 0.333 Maine
Izzy Bagi 19U-AAA-W · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG 0.556 Holy Cross
Kenzie Prater USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG 0.432 Quinnipiac
Emma Turbyville NE-Prep-Girls · 2013-14 · 0.39 PPG 0.040 St. Cloud State
Heidi Witt USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG 0.000 New Hampshire

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Cara Cook 2022-23 · 1.12 PPG 0.333 Aurora NCHA
Emerson Hardwick 2025-26 · 0.90 PPG — Post NE10
Amber Meluzio 2024-25 · 0.79 PPG 0.464 Elmira UCHC
Lily McKenzie 2024-25 · 1.81 PPG 0.210 Wisconsin-River Falls WIAC
Julia Osowski 2010-11 · 1.42 PPG 0.269 Wisconsin-Eau Claire WIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.