← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Sara Miller Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-03-15 Country: Canada Height: 5'5" (164 cm)
NCAA-W Projection
Arcadia
Verbal MAC D3W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.03
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.0303
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencemedium
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.09
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.0978
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencemedium
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

0%
NCAA D1W
8%
NCAA D3W
92%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2024-25 Balmoral Hall U18 Prep CSSHL-U18W 28 0 2 2 0.071 0.0164 0.0160
2025-26 Balmoral Hall U18 Prep CSSHL-U18W 27 0 5 5 0.185 0.0424 0.0399
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Sylvie Wallin USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG 0.333 Princeton
Brinna Dochniak USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG 0.111 RIT
Grace Bowlby USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG 0.316 Wisconsin
Paige Michel NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG 0.348 UConn
Ellie Larson USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG 0.143 RIT

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Samantha Estes 2013-14 · 0.36 PPG 0.385 Connecticut College NESCAC
Anna Bleck 2013-14 · 1.10 PPG 0.111 Connecticut College NESCAC
Ella Hennes 2022-23 · 0.85 PPG 0.143 Saint Mary's MIAC
Peyton Lemieur 2023-24 · 0.63 PPG 0.200 Saint Benedict MIAC
Madison McCullough 2022-23 · 0.32 PPG Wisconsin-Superior WIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.