IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Abraham Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-04-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Windsor Spitfires OHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Windsor Spitfires OHL 64 15 31 46 0.719 0.4171 0.4328 1.8419 1.9113
2022-23 Windsor Spitfires OHL 29 9 26 35 1.207 0.7004 0.6965 3.0927 3.0754
2023-24 Windsor Spitfires OHL 64 31 35 66 1.031 0.5984 0.5664 2.6424 2.5012
2024-25 Windsor Spitfires OHL 66 29 37 66 1.000 0.5803 0.5193 2.5625 2.2933
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Michigan Tech D1 CCHA FR 6 1 1 2 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.50
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2025-26 · Michigan Tech
-33.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
75%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3727
Forward overall
#84
Forward born in 2004
#195
in OHL

D1 Comparables

Shane Sooth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Average
NCAAe PPG
Eric Scheid
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Average
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Trevor Mingoia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lucas Signoretti
Buffalo State · 2024-25
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Woodward
SUNY Oswego · 2002-03
1.226 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Donny Flynn
Wilkes · 2016-17
1.423 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.