IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brennan Cazel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-02-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Chicago Crush USPHL-Premier 39 2 11 13 0.333 0.0436 0.0424 0.1131 0.1100
2024-25 — EHL 24 0 3 3 0.125 0.0289 0.0274 0.0612 0.0580
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Arizona State ACHA_D1 NCHC — 10 1 0 1 0.100
2024-25 Arizona State ACHA_D1 NCHC — 10 1 0 1 0.100
2023-24 Arizona State ACHA_D1 NCHC — 10 1 0 1 0.100
2022-23 Arizona State ACHA_D1 NCHC — 10 1 0 1 0.100
2021-22 Arizona State ACHA_D1 NCHC — 10 1 0 1 0.100
2020-21 Arizona State ACHA_D1 NCHC — 10 1 0 1 0.100

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12424
Defenseman overall
#2541
Defenseman born in 2004
#3639
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lucas Rothe
Chatham · 2018-19
0.210 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Peter Lopes
Alvernia · 2023-24
0.136 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jacob Kettwig
Roger Williams · 2024-25
0.100 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.