← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lucas Rothe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-01-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Syracuse Jr. Stars USPHL-Elite 42 9 19 28 0.667 0.1171 0.1190 0.1527 0.1551
2017-18 Utica Jr. Comets USPHL-Premier 41 11 18 29 0.707 0.2331 0.2258 0.2406 0.2331
2018-19 Soo Eagles NOJHL 36 4 6 10 0.278 0.0706 0.0641 0.1153 0.1046
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Chatham D3 UCHC GR 24 5 3 8 0.333
2022-23 Chatham D3 UCHC SR 15 1 6 7 0.467
2021-22 Chatham D3 UCHC JR 18 2 0 2 0.111
2020-21 Chatham D1 SO 13 4 1 5 0.385
2020-21 Chatham D3 UCHC SO 13 4 1 5 0.385
2019-20 Chatham D1 FR 19 3 1 4 0.210
2019-20 Chatham D3 UCHC FR 19 3 1 4 0.210
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2019-20 · Chatham
+91.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
88%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#39891
Forward overall
#2074
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-River Falls · 2016-17
0.379 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Becker · 2007-08
0.318 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Western Connecticut · 2024-25
0.118 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.