IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

A.J. Duggan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-01-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Texas Tornado NAHL 4 2 2 4 1.000 0.3674 0.3757 1.0555 1.0795
2013-14 — NAHL 30 6 9 15 0.500 0.1837 0.1787 0.5278 0.5133
2014-15 Amarillo Bulls NAHL 40 10 15 25 0.625 0.2296 0.2113 0.6597 0.6070
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC — 6 0 1 1 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2015-16 · Buffalo State
-1.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#23849
Forward overall
#926
Forward born in 1994
#1830
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Frank Tafelski
Adrian · 2023-24
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Braedan Cross
Manhattanville · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Holliday
Suffolk · 2014-15
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.