IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Grutta Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-04-22 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Wisconsin Rapids Riverkings USPHL-Premier 23 0 4 4 0.174 0.0573 0.0592 0.0592 0.0612
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 — — 27 0 3 3 0.111
2024-25 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 — — 27 0 3 3 0.111
2023-24 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 — — 27 0 3 3 0.111
2022-23 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 — — 27 0 3 3 0.111
2021-22 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 — — 27 0 3 3 0.111
2020-21 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 — — 27 0 3 3 0.111

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
72%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#55849
Forward overall
#3953
Forward born in 2005
#6392
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Ryan McMurphy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Storm
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jason Ford
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Parrottino
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Canisius
0.09 No data
NCAAe PPG
Josh Nenadal
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler O'Neill
Lake Forest · 2014-15
0.111 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Sean Burke
Finlandia · 2007-08
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chase Paylor
St. Thomas · 2010-11
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.