| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | Rockland Nationals | CCHL | 15 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.133 | 0.0426 | 0.0493 | 0.1032 | 0.1194 |
| 2012-13 | Rockland Nationals | CCHL | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2013-14 | Rockland Nationals | CCHL | 29 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.103 | 0.0330 | 0.0351 | 0.0800 | 0.0851 |
| 2014-15 | — | CCHL | 57 | 9 | 23 | 32 | 0.561 | 0.1793 | 0.1824 | 0.4346 | 0.4421 |
| 2015-16 | Pembroke Lumber Kings | CCHL | 58 | 12 | 23 | 35 | 0.603 | 0.1927 | 0.1867 | 0.4671 | 0.4526 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | Lake Forest | D1 | — | SR | 7 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.286 |
| 2019-20 | Lake Forest | D3 | NCHA | SR | 7 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.286 |
| 2018-19 | Lake Forest | D1 | — | JR | 16 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.188 |
| 2018-19 | Lake Forest | D3 | NCHA | JR | 16 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.188 |
| 2017-18 | Lake Forest | D3 | NCHA | SO | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2016-17 | Lake Forest | D3 | NCHA | FR | 9 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.111 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.