← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gavin Bryant Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-07-24 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Owen Sound Attack OHL 63 9 29 38 0.603 0.3490 0.3674 1.5474 1.6290
2022-23 Owen Sound Attack OHL 30 10 16 26 0.867 0.5014 0.5061 2.2234 2.2444
2023-24 Niagara IceDogs OHL 62 21 33 54 0.871 0.5039 0.4845 2.2345 2.1487
2024-25 Peterborough Petes OHL 54 10 15 25 0.463 0.2678 0.2437 1.1878 1.0809
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Sacred Heart D1 AHA FR 34 10 11 21 0.618
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2025-26 · Sacred Heart
+112.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9314
Forward overall
#358
Forward born in 2004
#463
in OHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Buffalo State · 2018-19
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
0.967 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2000-01
0.722 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.