IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Owen Van Steensel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-08-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 North Bay Battalion OHL 66 10 24 34 0.515 0.2990 0.3152 1.3202 1.3918
2022-23 North Bay Battalion OHL 68 11 17 28 0.412 0.2390 0.2416 1.0552 1.0668
2023-24 North Bay Battalion OHL 65 41 45 86 1.323 0.7678 0.7395 3.3904 3.2653
2024-25 North Bay Battalion OHL 67 23 30 53 0.791 0.4590 0.4184 2.0269 1.8475
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Clarkson D1 ECAC FR 38 12 13 25 0.658
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.51
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.66
2025-26 · Clarkson
+29.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5321
Forward overall
#154
Forward born in 2004
#351
in OHL

D1 Comparables

A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Bonner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.50 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michael Padgeon
Anna Maria · 2018-19
0.706 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Botten
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
1.133 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicolas Pigeon
Wisconsin-Stout · 2022-23
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.