IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brice Cooke Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-03-23 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Niagara IceDogs OHL 64 18 10 28 0.438 0.2531 0.2622 1.1242 1.1646
2022-23 Brampton Steelheads OHL 66 6 5 11 0.167 0.0964 0.0957 0.4283 0.4252
2023-24 North Bay Battalion OHL 63 13 12 25 0.397 0.2295 0.2168 1.0196 0.9633
2024-25 Toronto Patriots OJHL 52 36 33 69 1.327 0.3252 0.2952 0.9136 0.8293
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Canisius D1 AHA FR 11 0 2 2 0.182
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2025-26 · Canisius
-19.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18461
Forward overall
#940
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Derek Hansberry
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2004-05
1.259 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Barry Kneedler
Neumann · 2016-17
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Conor Foley
Franklin Pierce · 2018-19
0.710 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.