← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lucas Moore Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-06-07 Country: Canada
Niagara
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Brantford Bulldogs OHL 34 3 7 10 0.294 0.1701 0.1865 0.7701 0.8442
2022-23 Brantford Bulldogs OHL 65 3 25 28 0.431 0.2492 0.2624 1.1280 1.1878
2023-24 Brantford Bulldogs OHL 66 5 21 26 0.394 0.2279 0.2291 1.0314 1.0367
2024-25 Brantford Bulldogs OHL 68 4 17 21 0.309 0.1786 0.1703 0.8086 0.7710
2025-26 Brantford Bulldogs OHL 66 11 22 33 0.500 0.2893 0.2613 1.3092 1.1825
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4983
Defenseman overall
#1266
Defenseman born in 2005
#902
in OHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

Niagara Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

BCHL 2025-26
0.00
actual FR PPG at Niagara
OHL 2025-26
0.00
actual FR PPG at Niagara
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Niagara
NAHL 2022-23
0.18
actual FR PPG at Niagara

D2/3 Comparables

St. John Fisher · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2017-18
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
1.030 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.