← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lucas Moore Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-06-07 Country: Canada
Niagara
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Brantford Bulldogs OHL 34 3 7 10 0.294 0.1701 0.1865 0.7557 0.8284
2022-23 Brantford Bulldogs OHL 65 3 25 28 0.431 0.2492 0.2624 1.1069 1.1656
2023-24 Brantford Bulldogs OHL 66 5 21 26 0.394 0.2279 0.2291 1.0121 1.0173
2024-25 Brantford Bulldogs OHL 68 4 17 21 0.309 0.1786 0.1703 0.7935 0.7566
2025-26 Brantford Bulldogs OHL 66 11 22 33 0.500 0.2893 0.2613 1.2848 1.1604
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4910
Defenseman overall
#1255
Defenseman born in 2005
#875
in OHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

Niagara Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Niagara
NAHL 2022-23
0.18
actual FR PPG at Niagara
USHL 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Niagara
NAHL 2023-24
0.24
actual FR PPG at Niagara

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2014-15
1.074 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2015-16
1.273 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
1.241 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.