IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Peter Christofidis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-03-02 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Chicago Cougars USPHL-Premier 32 3 1 4 0.125 0.0163 0.0166 0.0424 0.0431
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Roosevelt University ACHA_D1 — — 12 2 0 2 0.167
2024-25 Roosevelt University ACHA_D1 — — 12 2 0 2 0.167
2023-24 Roosevelt University ACHA_D1 — — 12 2 0 2 0.167
2022-23 Roosevelt University ACHA_D1 — — 12 2 0 2 0.167
2021-22 Roosevelt University ACHA_D1 — — 12 2 0 2 0.167

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Club / ACHA
72%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27751
Defenseman overall
#4135
Defenseman born in 2006
#6952
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Phil Boje
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Maller
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Richard Buri
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Sam Piazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Michigan (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Frye
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew Christ
Fredonia · 2007-08
0.296 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Derek Sand
Wisconsin-Stout · 2010-11
0.192 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Benjamin Douglas
Morrisville · 2022-23
0.059 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.