← New Search ↗ Social Card

Curren Stukey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-06-08 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Hampton Roads Whalers USPHL-Elite 28 12 12 24 0.857 0.0791 0.0785 0.1963 0.1948
2025-26 Hampton Roads Whalers USPHL-Elite 2 1 1 2 1.000 0.0923 0.0874 0.2290 0.2168
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Colorado ACHA_D1 18 2 1 3 0.167
2024-25 University of Colorado ACHA_D1 18 2 1 3 0.167
2023-24 University of Colorado ACHA_D1 18 2 1 3 0.167
2022-23 University of Colorado ACHA_D1 18 2 1 3 0.167
2021-22 University of Colorado ACHA_D1 18 2 1 3 0.167

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Club / ACHA
38%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#52521
Forward overall
#3472
Forward born in 2006
#880
in USPHL-Elite

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Boston · 2016-17
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2013-14
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2016-17
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.