IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zach Doerring Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-06-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 — NAHL 43 2 7 9 0.209 0.0769 0.0801 0.2209 0.2302
2013-14 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 49 7 16 23 0.469 0.1725 0.1711 0.4955 0.4915
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 26 14 13 27 1.038
2016-17 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 27 7 18 25 0.926
2015-16 Concordia D3 MIAC SO 26 3 11 14 0.538
2014-15 Concordia D3 MIAC FR 26 4 8 12 0.462
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2014-15 · Concordia
+300.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#37563
Forward overall
#1480
Forward born in 1994
#3893
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alfred Larsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Vincent Anderson
New England College · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Derton
St. Norbert · 2001-02
0.633 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ross Ring-Jarvi
Gustavus Adolphus · 2006-07
1.033 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.