← New Search ↗ Social Card

Noah Van Vliet Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-02-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0490 0.0490 0.1377 0.1377
2021-22 Brantford Bulldogs OHL 11 0 2 2 0.182 0.1052 0.1085 0.4760 0.4909
2022-23 Brantford Bulldogs OHL 61 3 12 15 0.246 0.1423 0.1406 0.6439 0.6362
2023-24 Sudbury Wolves OHL 68 4 11 15 0.221 0.1276 0.1200 0.5776 0.5430
2024-25 Niagara IceDogs OHL 67 8 12 20 0.298 0.1727 0.1534 0.7816 0.6944
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Sacred Heart D1 AHA FR 13 0 3 3 0.231
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2025-26 · Sacred Heart
+74.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10766
Defenseman overall
#2288
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Salve Regina · 2011-12
0.962 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2010-11
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2016-17
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.