IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Thomas Parini Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-03-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Bearcat Junior Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 5 1 0 1 0.200 0.0226 0.0219 0.0679 0.0658
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 SUNYAC — 8 1 2 3 0.375
2024-25 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 SUNYAC — 8 1 2 3 0.375
2023-24 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 SUNYAC — 8 1 2 3 0.375
2022-23 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 SUNYAC — 8 1 2 3 0.375
2021-22 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 SUNYAC — 8 1 2 3 0.375

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
42%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sean Pettinger
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2004-05
0.174 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Wilkins
SUNY Geneseo · 2017-18
0.115 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Bouchard
Curry · 2016-17
0.261 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.